Positive Case Results
Drug Possession Case: Client charged with possession for sale of marijuana had prior convictions for possession of marijuana. Case verdict was deferred entry of judgment (Prop 36).
Drug Cultivation Case: Client was charged with cultivation of 200 marijuana plants using stolen power from SDG&E. The case was made based on a questionable initial police search without a search warrant. Case verdict was a dismissal of the cultivation charge, and settlement of mere power cost restitution, or payment, to SDG&E.
Drug Cultivation Case: Client was charged with cultivation of 236 marijuana plants, with sales to 9 marijuana collectives. Case verdict reduced cultivation of marijuana charge to simple possession of more than an ounce and 5 days of community service.
DUI Case: Client was charged with driving while under the influence of Xanax. Case verdict was a dismissal.
Illegal Alien Transportation Case: Client was charged with transportation of 3 illegal aliens, but a questionable search occurred based upon a questionable stop of the vehicle. Case verdict was for a misdemeanor for aiding entry of an illegal alien with a sentence of merely 5 months in jail.
Drug Trafficking Case: Client was charged with importing 5 ounces of cocaine. Case verdict was 30 months in custody.
White Collar Crime: Client was charged with wire fraud, bribery and illegal contracting with the Department of Defense. Verdict was 11 months in custody.
Theft Case: Client was charged with theft of $400.00 worth of clothing from a department store: Verdict was simple trespassing.
DUI Case: Client was charged with driving while under the influence of drugs after a prior conviction of driving while under the influence of alcohol and driving with a suspended license. Verdict was a wet reckless driving judgment.
Drug Sales Case: Client was charged with possession for sale of marijuana. Verdict reduced to a misdemeanor for simple possession of marijuana with 5 days of community service.
About Drug Charges: What You Need to Know
Our office represents individuals charged with a variety of drug offenses, from simple possession of marijuana to international conspiracies involving heroin, cocaine, ecstasy, chemicals, cultivation of marijuana, and distribution of all types of controlled substances. The Geller Firm represents people in state and federal courts.
The primary defense in most drug possession for sale cases concerns whether the prosecution can establish facts to show the defendant was in control of these substances and that the search of the defendant was legal. Warrantless searches are presumptively illegal. Searches with warrants are often illegal, as well. Our office has had great success -- as indicated by the aforementioned cases -- in suppressing evidence and having cases dismissed resulting from illegal searches.
Challenging Prosecution Lab Reports: Our Experts Leave No Stone Unturned
Recently, in the case Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, the Supreme Court held that crime lab reports are so critically important that an analyst who conducts the testing and prepares the report must be called as a witness to determine whether the evidence can be used in court.
The Geller Firm routinely has lab reports reviewed by our experts and neutral laboratories to determine whether they are valid and can be trusted. We also use numerous forensic experts, including psychologists, toxicologists, DNA fingerprint analysts, as well as three licensed private investigators, to assist us in the review and analysis of evidence.
Through our experienced experts, The Geller Firm has successfully challenged airplane searches, canine searches, border searches, and illegal stops of vehicle.